Home › Posts tagged National Residency Match Program
Blog Archives

Residency Applicant Characteristics: Key Differences Between Those who are Ranked Highly and Those who Aren’t

Posted on by by

The NRMP posted a webinar on applicant characteristics associated with success and failure in the recent Match, specifically focusing on Family Medicine, OB/GYN, Otolaryngology, Pathology, and Diagnostic Radiology.

The webinar presents data tracking trends in whom programs (from those five specialties) ranked. NRMP says they hope to help applicants and residency directors gain a clearer understanding of the factors influencing candidate selection. Some of the data is to be expected (average Step 2 scores are higher for Otolaryngology than for Family Medicine), but there there are more specifics offered: Over three quarters of Otolaryngology programs don’t take applicants with Step 2 scores under 225 whereas half of Family Medicine programs take applicants with Step 2 scores as low as 215. There are some other interesting factoids that might guide candidates’ approach to the Match.

Here’s the YouTube link.

Tags: , , ,

Welcome to Match Week

Posted on by by

This is Match Week:

Monday: Programs find out if they filled; applicants find out if they matched; SOAP begins. Here’s a 2025 primer on SOAP.
Tuesday through Thursday: SOAP process in play.
Friday: Match Day.

If you were one of my residency clients this year, I’d appreciate hearing from you when you have a moment to update me. I’m sending everyone the best of wishes.

Tags: , , ,

NRMP® Data Indicates Matched Residency Applicants had Longer Rank Order Lists than Unmatched Ones

Posted on by by

Over the years, the NRMP has published data regarding the impact of length of rank order list (ROL) on success in the Match. I first noticed information on this topic in a document called the Impact of Length of Rank Order List on Main Residency Match Outcomes: 2002-2016. There, the NRMP reported that matched applicants consistently had longer ROLs than unmatched applicants. More recently, this information has been validated in the NRMP’s Impact of Length of Rank Order List on Match Results: 2004-2023 Main Residency Match. 

Since the latter document assesses two decades of Matches, we can take it seriously. Those approaching the application process should consider a reasonably wide net in choosing residency programs at which to apply and then should include all programs on their ROLs that they would consider “acceptable,” meaning an applicant would rather train there than not Match. Of course, there is a financial cost to applying broadly, and that expense needs to be balanced. However, according to this data, matched applicants and filled programs consistently have longer ROLs than unmatched applicants and unfilled programs. The NRMP reminds candidates that a longer ROL does not adversely affect the chances of matching to choices higher on the ROL. Here’s a video that reinforces that fact. 

Tags: , , ,

2023 Match Data

Posted on by by

The NRMP recently published data regarding the most recent Match. Of note, emergency medicine – my specialty – had a whopping 554 positions that remained unfilled. Ouch! Additionally, although the numbers were better than last year, IMGs still struggled: US citizen IMGs saw only a 67.6% Match rate and non-US citizen IMGs had only a 59.4% Match rate.

There is a lot of data to review, so take a look here if you want more information on DO Match rates, specialty competitiveness, and SOAP. 

Tags: , , ,

Your Residency Application: Five Factors to Prioritize When Creating your Rank List

Posted on by by

Creating your Match rank list can be absolutely agonizing because it feels like so much is at stake. Sometimes it helps to step back and look at the big picture. Below, I briefly note a few important considerations when making your list:

1. Make sure you understand how the NRMP algorithm works. See my previous blog post regarding errors to avoid at all costs. The key is to rank in the order you want – first goes first, second goes second, etc.

2. Consider your happiness and life balance. Blasphemy perhaps, but I would argue that they are more important than the strength of the training program.

3. Reflect on the culture, geography, size, and even maturity/age of the program. Think about whether you will fit in.

4. Consider whether you could spend your whole life at the institution or in that program’s location. It’s a lot to grapple with, but many residents graduate and stay for the rest of their careers.

5. Decide whether you liked the program director, chairperson, and faculty generally. They could make or break your happiness and success.

Tags: , , ,

About Dr. Michelle Finkel

Dr. Michelle Finkel

Dr. Finkel is a graduate of Stanford University and Harvard Medical School. On completing her residency at Harvard, she was asked to
stay on as faculty at Harvard Medical School and spent five years teaching at the world-renowned Massachusetts General Hospital.
She was appointed to the Assistant Residency Director position for the Harvard Affiliated
Emergency Medicine Residency where she reviewed countless applications, personal statements and resumes. Read more

Receive FREE Insider Medical Admissions Tips.

Sign Up

Listen to Dr. Finkel’s interview on the White Coat Investor podcast:

Listen to Dr. Finkel’s interview on the FeminEm podcast: