Home › Posts tagged Medical School Application › Page 3
Blog Archives

“Optional” Secondary Essays: Are They Really?

Posted on by by

I’ve recently received several questions about optional secondary essays and their necessity.

The beauty of an “additional comments” section is that it is intentionally vague. It’s your chance to provide details, context, or qualifications that the structure of the application didn’t allow you to present. For that reason, I lean toward using that space to both highlight who you are and any exceptional aspect of your candidacy that you’d want a reader to know before making an interview decision.

So, one good option for these essays is to pick something completely nonmedical that distinguishes you and is nowhere else to be found on your application. In this case, the essay can actually be fun to write.

Of note, sometimes people use this type of a prompt to explain one major deficiency in their candidacy. I only recommend that if there’s a big elephant in the room: In other words, in general I tell applicants – throughout the process – to avoid highlighting weaknesses. The goal is to demonstrate distinctiveness and worthiness, so negatives are usually left out. But sometimes someone has a big problem like a low MCAT score that is an anomaly that’s worth addressing head on.

Bottom line:  Since an interview isn’t guaranteed, don’t save your best material for an in-person meeting. Get your foot in the door. And as always, make sure your essay is substantive and not fluffy.

Tags: , , ,

AMCAS: What’s the Big Deal about Rolling Admissions?

Posted on by by

This year’s AMCAS application opened last week, and candidates will be able to submit beginning May 30. 

Because of rolling admissions, submitting a complete application early in the cycle has distinct advantages at many schools. That doesn’t mean you should present suboptimal written materials; instead, you should start early enough (like, yesterday) that you’re showcasing your best work.

Rolling admissions means that a school takes applications in the order in which they are received and makes decisions about interviews and then acceptances, accordingly. So, as time goes by, there are fewer interview and admissions offers remaining to be made. Think of an auditorium whose doors open to allow guests in. Those in the front of the line get the seats, and those who come later may not have a chair to sit in.

If your application is not complete, your candidacy may not be evaluated early when there are more opportunities for interviews and admissions. So, if you have not already, get started immediately. It could make a huge difference in your available opportunities.

Tags: , , ,

Ten AMCAS Mistakes You Absolutely Want to Avoid

Posted on by by

Here’s a quick and dirty list of AMCAS Work and Activities section errors to avoid at all costs:

1. Don’t write to write, and don’t fill to the maximum character count unless necessary. While you want to include many strong achievements, you do not want your AMCAS to be so wordy that your reader is tempted to skim.

2. While you need to be brief, don’t write in phrases; use full sentences. It’s a formal application, and you want to make your written materials as readable as possible.

3. Don’t assume your reader will carefully study the “header” section (including the title of the activity, hours, etc.). Make sure your descriptor could stand alone: Instead of “As an assistant, I conducted experiments…” use “As a research assistant at a Stanford Medical School neuroscience lab, I conducted experiments…”

4. Don’t be vague or trite. Make sure you spell out your accomplishments clearly and substantively. If your reader doesn’t understand an activity, you will not get “full credit” for what you’ve done. Make no assumptions.

5. Avoid abbreviations. Again, you want to be formal, and abbreviations you think are common might not be familiar to the reader.

6. Write about yourself and your role – not an organization. For example, don’t use the space to discuss Doctors without Borders. Use it to discuss the specifics of your role at Doctors without Borders.

7. Avoid generalities and consider using numbers to be persuasive. Saying that the conference you organized had 300 participants says it all.

8. Don’t merge the descriptors with the most meaningful paragraphs because they are separate sections: You can complete descriptors for up to 15 activities with up to 700 characters each plus up to three most meaningful paragraphs of up to 1325 characters each.

9. Unless your PI won the Nobel, avoid using supervisors’ and/or doctors’ names in your descriptors as they will be meaningless to the majority of your readers.

10. Choose the right category for each activity, so you get “full credit.”

Bonus: Get help. Do not submit your medical school application without having it reviewed by someone with experience. You do not want to showcase suboptimal materials for a process that is this important and competitive.

 

Tags: , , ,

Medical School Letters of Recommendation: Asking the right people 

Posted on by by

For those applying to medical school this cycle, if you haven’t already, it’s time to start asking for letters of recommendation (LOR).

Beyond simply fulfilling requirements, you want to get the strongest letters you possibly can from the most influential writers. Choosing the right individuals can be a challenge, and advisees often ask me what to look for in a letter writer. Here is my suggested wish list for potential letter-writers:

1. Explicitly state they will write you a strong LOR

2. Senior faculty

3. Weighty academic titles
4. Well known in their field
5. Spent significant time with you
6. Experienced letter-writers

Of course, all of these qualifications are not possible for all writers. But the more of these you can garner the better. 

With regard to #1, don’t be afraid to ask a potential letter-writer if she will write you “a very strong” LOR. It may seem awkward at the time you ask, but, believe me, getting a wimpy letter will be much thornier. If the faculty member says no, hesitates, or tells you in March that she has to plan her Thanksgiving get-together ;), politely thank her and move on. Although disappointing, acknowledge that she has done you a huge favor. You are far better off avoiding her letter, and you now have the advantage of substituting a stronger LOR written by someone who loves you.

With regard to #2 through 4, admissions officers are human just like the rest of us: Receiving a LOR from an accomplished, known colleague will be weighed much more heavily than one from someone deemed less successful and unfamiliar. If you are better connected to someone without a title, consider asking the professor (a more senior person who has a weightier title) if she would consider writing the LOR with significant input from your closer contact (i.e., the TA who taught your section, or the postdoctoral fellow who directly supervised your research project). That way you get a LOR that includes insight from someone who knows you, signed by a name that packs a punch.

Tags: , , ,

Pre-Med? Avoid a Big Mistake

Posted on by by

Several years ago I was hired by a re-applicant who wanted to better understand why she did not get into medical school the prior year. She had a 3.9 GPA and a 40 on her MCAT (100% percentile). Yet, she had been rejected from all medical schools.

I looked through her materials and discovered the problem. The applicant had no clinical work at all. She had never been in the room with a patient. Many of you know that I like the saying, “No one wants to hire a chef who hasn’t been in the kitchen.” She had fallen prey to that adage.

We talked, and I advised her regarding options she had for obtaining clinical experience. Fast forward a year: The client completed a robust clinical activity and was readily accepted to medical school (and felt more confident about her career choice).

If you are a pre-med, note that robust clinical experience is critical. Working as an EMT, in a good clinical care extender program, formally as a scribe (where you can also make some money), in a hospice setting, or in a low-income clinic are just some ideas for obtaining excellent clinical exposure. (Although you might think free clinics would be thrilled to have a pre-med volunteer, many understandably require one-year commitments.) 

Shadowing is a mixed bag: Medical schools don’t know whether you’re second-assisting in the operating room or just standing in a corner being ignored. If you choose to shadow, make sure that – in your written materials – you highlight any substantive clinical skills gained. Other popular options for clinical experience include international work (although the activity is usually short-lived, which makes it less robust) and working as a volunteer in a hospital (although it might be more clerical than clinical, depending on the position; thus, the benefit of clinical care extender programs. Do your research before accepting a volunteer hospital job). I’ve also had advisees who became certified, practicing phlebotomists and others who worked in veterinarians’ offices to obtain procedural skills.

More important than getting into medical school (gasp), getting robust clinical experience will help you ensure you’ve made the right career choice. Simultaneously, you’ll demonstrate to admissions officers that you can handle the heat.

See the short video below on the importance of clinical experience:

Tags: , , ,

About Dr. Michelle Finkel

Dr. Michelle Finkel

Dr. Finkel is a graduate of Stanford University and Harvard Medical School. On completing her residency at Harvard, she was asked to stay on as faculty at Harvard Medical School and spent five years teaching at the world-renowned Massachusetts General Hospital. She was appointed to the Assistant Residency Director position for the Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency where she reviewed countless applications, personal statements and resumes. Read more

Receive FREE Insider Medical Admissions Tips.

Sign Up

Listen to Dr. Finkel’s interview on the White Coat Investor podcast:

Listen to Dr. Finkel’s interview on the FeminEm podcast: